FlawlessVictor
New member
I hate excessively loud music as well. I once rode in a car with someone who cranked up the bass; I felt dizzy and lost my sense of balance. I never understand why people like to bring attention to themselves like that.
Some people. There's no other way to listen to metal but to blast it just short of permanent hearing damage.
As for complaints about music volumes, I stand by what Ted Nugent once said...if it's too loud, you're too old.
Book purists (not only comic books but book purists, in general) annoy me to no end, as well.
"That's not how it happened in the book. Boo-hoo."
Look, I like comic books and reading the original story in the books too, but it's very possible that the producer and / or movie director saw something in the original source material that would have sucked major ass, on the big screen, so they made some tweaks to it.
You can get away with being more vague and leaving the readers to their imaginations in the books than you can in when people watch movies, where you are showing something that's physically visual.
Book purists (not only comic books but book purists, in general) annoy me to no end, as well.
"That's not how it happened in the book. Boo-hoo."
Look, I like comic books and reading the original story in the books too, but it's very possible that the producer and / or movie director saw something in the original source material that would have sucked major ass, on the big screen, so they made some tweaks to it.
You can get away with being more vague and leaving the readers to their imaginations in the books than you can in when people watch movies, where you are showing something that's physically visual.
That being said, film adaptions of books tend to water down or diverge from what the author intended. Books that are larger in scope are better suited to be broken down in a series rather than crammed to into a 2-hour film.
I agree it is unreasonable to expect all films to follow books to the tee. Book authors simply have a lot more lot more flexibility in expressing ideas that would be hard to translate to film, which leans heavily towards the audio and visual effects. For example, in book an author can at length describe the describe the horrible taste and smell of moldy cheese, while the film would be limited to the character's reaction or in some cases internal monologue.
Book purists (not only comic books but book purists, in general) annoy me to no end, as well.
"That's not how it happened in the book. Boo-hoo."
Look, I like comic books and reading the original story in the books too, but it's very possible that the producer and / or movie director saw something in the original source material that would have sucked major ass, on the big screen, so they made some tweaks to it.
You can get away with being more vague and leaving the readers to their imaginations in the books than you can in when people watch movies, where you are showing something that's physically visual.
Nothing wrong with being a purist.
One of the larger reasons Annihilation sucked is because damn near nothing that happened in the movie happened in the game.
Sure casual fans could give a shit less, but when Shinnok turned out to be the father of Raiden and Kahn (lol so nerdy sounding) all of us collectively had aneurysms