theincubuslord
New member
marvel vs. LOL!!!
Marvel VS League of Legends? I don't think I know that game.
(I know what you meant, but couldn't help myself.
marvel vs. LOL!!!
Completely disagree. Had more characters had a female attached to them, people would still complain. It's not about a lack of female's in the sense of being female, but the lack of female characters that you can play with. Had more characters had a little woman attached to them, people still wouldn't be satisfied. Ferra serves no purpose to the Ferra/Torr character aside from being Torr's 'personality.' There are a lot of fans who main females, them fans aren't gonna main Torr for the sake of Ferra.
Ferra is just Torr's brain, you don't consider Raiden's brain a character.
It's a bit extreme but that's kind of what people mean (my very self included).
correct but what people don't seem to understand is the amount of fans who play as the males LARGELY OUTWEIGHS the fans who use females. The males,are used more therefore they dominate the rosters.
Yes , agreed! I can't believe people count Ferra.
IMO the body that you can do the fatality on is what we should count the character as. otherwise it's an assist, like in marvel vs. LOL!!!
Exactly, I don't care about female characters, being Skarlet and D'Vorah the only exceptions.
Well Kitana is earning a place in my heart in this game, her assassin variation is sick.
Just because the majority are straight males who like to play as male characters doesn't mean they are the only ones who should be catered to though.
That's why there are female characters too.
But just like you said, the majority of us are males, so it makes sense that the majority of the characters are male too.
Just because the majority are straight males who like to play as male characters doesn't mean they are the only ones who should be catered to though.
Depends on how you look at it. I find it kinda funny that alot of straight males prefers to play as big, muscly, half-naked men in games instead of busty, half-naked women. ;P
I know it's not about that though, don't worry.
I honestly don't understand how you see Ferra as playable but w/e.
She may in STORY/LORE tell Torr what to do. Which is why I made that statement earlier, that she counts in story/lore
But in game, your fingers control Torr. The code goes straight to Torr. You don't control Ferra and influence Torr like you would with Ice climbers, or the dog form Zappa in guilty Gear, or Nirvana from Blazblue.
This is only an issue because we're dividing it into black-and-white "she either is 100% a playable character, or is 0% a playable character."
Obviously the truth is that she's somewhere in between, she's far less playable than Torr, and far more playable than your typical assist character who swoops in for an attack and then disappears again. This is enough for me to consider her a playable female character on the roster. NRS obviously wants me to, because the character isn't named Torr.
I don't see how naming a character on the screen means they're playable...
I'd argue persona's in Persona 4 arena are more playable than Ferra.
Ferra's name on the screen isn't what makes her playable, the numerous moves, brutalities, and fatalities that she performs on the opponent after you press certain buttons makes her playable. All Ferra's name on the screen does is tell us what NRS think of her - an even split character just like Noob and Smoke.
her doing a fatality with you or doing a Xray with you isn't you playing her.. that's her acting on her own accord to your actions.