Re: [SPOILER, RUMOR] Sub-Zero's identity in MKX is...
Soulnado theory makes sense. I just don't think it's perfect.
Thank you. It doesn't have to be perfect, but just because it isn't perfect doesn't mean that it's full of holes or that there isn't an explanation for it,
I beg to differ
1. It has still never been stated anywhere at all that Noob Saibot and Bi-Han are different entities. You and a couple others have taken that ish and ran with it but nah. It's never been said they are different.
2. Once again why of all the people on earth would the elder gods trust bi-Han over literally anyone else. Yeah, he helped defeat Shinnok. He was also just serving him in the netherealm. He could help them, but if the evil in him came back out then the elder gods would be screwed.
3. You are still implying Bi-Han is Earth's protector yet he has never shown any protector qualities. In fact, he's always been sort of self centered not caring about anyone, but himself.
That's just a few but there are more. Just because you LIKE this theory does not mean it's most likely to happen.
And you have a right to differ, just as I have a right to defend it.
1) Says the person who likes to pick and choose stuff from the old timeline, like Kuai's MK4 ending and that he was the Grandmaster in the OLD time line (which has NOTHING to do with the new MK9 / MKX timeline, BTW), yet I can't use Noob's MK Armageddon ending as an example of a possibility of a "divided soul" theory?
A theory which NRS thought enough about, to even use an an ending.
Granted, it's not canon, but it doesn't mean that it
can't happen or that NRS
can't think of using something like that either, as you so like to say and imply.
2) You answered your own question right there.
He previously defeated Shinnok and Quan Chi, as per MK9.
You LOVE to argue that Mythologies is still canon, but we don't know if that's actually true, since Ed Boon said that the timeline skewed.
All that we know, per MK9, is that Bi-Han defeated the armies of Shinnok and Quan Chi, and everything else from the old timeline is mere speculation.
Plus, how would his screwing over the Elder Gods after they made him their Champion be a bad thing?
It actually fits right into Bi-Han's character of being an asshole-like dude, and it would be a good plot twist,
IF it happened.
Everybody thinks that Bi-Han will change for the better, being the Elder gods' Champion, and he goes and does his own thing and screws them over.
3) Him being given the title of Earth's protector by the Elder Gods doesn't mean that he will actually follow through and do that, though.
Per reply #2, why can't he just screw them over and do whatever he wants, causing Raiden to be pissed at him for such deception?
It's more likely,
to me. <=== Key words that you missed, though.
This is why everyone is entitled to an opinion.
I have mine and you have yours, but you sure as hell are NO ONE to tell me or imply that my
opinion is wrong, just because YOU don't agree with it.
It's just an opinion, not a fact.
I don't brag/taunt i say whatever and move on (if i win), unlike Araknyd who will probably rub it in my face if he wins.
Goes to show how much you don't know me.
Unlike you, I have stated various times that I will concede to being wrong if it ends up being Kuai.
I just don't like my theory being constantly
shat on, as you often have done, as well as implying that it
can't happen.
If you think he's going to win then you must think he's at least a little right. Plus I see you bring it up anywhere, which is like the definition of taunting.
This.
Yes, which means you are implying that he has a shot. If you truly believed his theory was incorrect then you would not say if he wins, which is my point. And every thread I go into Aaraknyd says anything about sub zero and youre right behind him posting just to call his theory shitty.
Thank. You. Sir.
Also a part of that thread was you can also add your reasoning as to why they win if you like. Which he did
Yes, sir.
I replied to the 1 person (forgot who) with the Soulnado theory in that thread,
after it was brought up, explaining why Sub-Zero doesn't HAVE to be an assassin in MKX (being relevant to the topic at hand), and then continued to go on the thread voting for the different characters, unlike [MENTION=18204]Rolling_Toaster[/MENTION] who kept trying to instigate another argument.
