Critical-Limit
New member
You guys say things like Oh well if MK still has the blood and the kicka** fatalities, and a few other things. Then I see people say things like place Sub-Zero in a female body, or keep him cyber. Hell, make him a bad guy, let's have someone just use his body even though it doesn't have a soul, then saying he doesn't need a soul. Which is one of the most hugely unignorable traits that he fought for in the old timeline. He fought for a soul.
I know you guys say just forget the old timeline. However, when you come in and you say that this is a continuation of an old timeline and you start changing stuff willy nilly without Raiden touching a thing, it becomes ridiculous.
So, and this is not directed at anyone in particular. When you start removing, and killing characters (and assume this is for good), at what point does it stay MK, and not just some bad horror movie or disappointing science fiction where everyone dies?
You say Well let's do this and let's do that to a character. Make them a cyborg, have them turn bad, or anything of the sort. At what point do you lose what that character is about entirely, and just realize that you have not stayed true to a character, but just made a new character completely?
Here's my thing with Cyber Subz.
Different look
Different playstyle
Different ambitions now because quite frankly anything he cared about in the old timeline is I wouldn't say gone, but definitely put on hold.
So at what point do you say this isn't Sub-Zero anymore? I mean I'm being honest here.
At what point to you guys say something isn't MK, because I'm sorry if they just put a bunch of characters in that we haven't seen and put Mortal Kombat on it then I don't see that as Mortal Kombat.
However, some of you act as if you're completely fine with that, and I'll just say I'm not. I would say at it's core at least these characters help mold an identity for Mortal Kombat: Sub-Zero, Scorpion, Raiden, Sonya, and a couple others, but those are the main ones. When you start changing their identities though they aren't the same character.
I'm pissed because I feel that Sub-Zero in the old timeline would have fought life and limb to not become cyber, and possibly would have just killed himself before he would have. He fought for humanity, for life. To prove that cybernetics are not better than human flesh and will. He then shoved all of that up Sektor's arse and took back the Lin Kuei to make it a force for good, and ultimately became one of the best good guys out there. That's a huge part of what his character stood for. That is his character in essence. So when you turn him into exactly what he fought against it kind of pisses people off, and I'm really surprised that some of you just don't get that.
Everything you listed was just speculation. Again, you jump to conclusions and make everything look grim.
Why can't he do great things as a cyborg with the SAME MIND he had as a human?
Just answer that one question.
As long as it's a contuination of some form of a story and series of events related to the realms and gods ect ect. It will always be Mortal Kombat.
The characters just have a special place in your heart because You grew up with them and they started the whole thing.
But why jump ship when a new thing COULD be better?
I'd rather take my shot at change and hope for the best than to stay stagnate forever and have the same old characters doing the same nilly willy things.
Oh Khameleon is still tryna bang reptile.
Oh Raiden is still protecting earth realm
Sonya is still chasin Kano
How about we resolve some issues, have some tragedys that make your heart weep and cry out in sadness. Then see new rising heros?
Just a thought.