All things Tanya! - Official Diskussion Thread

I'm patiently waiting for Tanya to be released so she can be my second main. I'm surprised I haven't had any friendly matches with many of you. Feel free to add me on PSN if you'd like to battle :)
 
i read some casual fans calling her the new "female scorpion" smh.

I certainly hope most won't think that. Tanya and Scorpion have not much similarities design wise besides the color schemes :/
 
I hope she gets a MK2 female ninja costume. No i dont care she was never a "ninja" backstory wise, look wise she looks like one. And i love the MK2 costume.
 
So did they replace the Story Model or what?
No it's still the same.

For now, anyways. Hopefully they will replace it in Story Mode as well. ^^

I hope she gets a MK2 female ninja costume. No i dont care she was never a "ninja" backstory wise, look wise she looks like one. And i love the MK2 costume.

I cringe every time someone says this. I REALLY don't want this to be a thing, because it would confirm Tanya to be an "MK ninja" palette-swap, and to me that would be a disappointment. I've said it before, but I want the former palette-swaps to go as far away from that concept as possible, not turn existing characters into some. XD
 
She formerly was a palette-swap, though.
In MK4, Tanya was originally supposed to be Kitana.
I agree with you, though, and I also don't want more palette-swap costumes in MKX.
 
I cringe every time someone says this. I REALLY don't want this to be a thing, because it would confirm Tanya to be an "MK ninja" palette-swap, and to me that would be a disappointment. I've said it before, but I want the former palette-swaps to go as far away from that concept as possible, not turn existing characters into some. XD

That's not your choice. Tanya was clearly designed after the Jade/Mileena/Kitana. She has always been and will always be the yellow female ninja regardless if she is actually a ninja or no. Face it and embrace it.

She formerly was a palette-swap, though.

just go away and save the rest of us from an idiotic semantics argument please.
 
Top