I thought it was okay. It stands out against the others, and it's really memorable because of Goro.that MK4 cover was so bad. lol
The Dragon Logo and...
View attachment 8501
Funny you bring up the Beatles...their highest RIAA certified album had NOTHING but a blank sheet of white on that cover (otherwise it wouldn't be called the White Album). (Then again, it was a double album, so the RIAA counted the sales twice in the certification because of it.)Scorpion doesn't NEED to be on the cover for the game to sell well, and 7 games in the past have proven that.
After 23 years, if gaming people don't know that iconic dragon logo, then they've been living under a rock.
MK has made its mark on pop-culture, and it doesn't need a yellow-clad ninja on the cover to sell games.
Scorpion on the cover is just a bonus, the same way that Super Mario on the cover of a Super Mario game is a bonus, but neither of those is NEEDED to sell more copies.
The dragon logo alone would still sell a TON of copies, just the same way that the words "Super Mario" on the cover of the game would sell a TON of copies.
Do Elvis or The Beatles need to be on the front cover of their music albums to sell copies? No.
It's a nice added bonus, but it isn't needed.
THAT'S my point.
The Dragon Logo, however, is necessary. It is the video game equivalent of Iron Maiden's famous mascot, Eddie the Head (see my avatar).Yup.
The White Album is mostly what I was implying.
I don't remember an Elvis album without Elvis on it, but I'm pretty sure that the name Elvis alone would have sold millions.
Metallica's Black Album is the same.
No artwork needed to sell the album.
Mortal Kombat is the same in the games category.
I'm pretty sure that the words Mortal Kombat, alone, would sell millions of copies of the game.
The dragon logo, Scorpion and all the other art is bonus filler fluff, but not needed.
The name alone has become a pop-culture icon.