This isn't DBZ, where Gohan and Trunks can fuse to become Gotenks.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I547 using Tapatalk
I know you are but what am I?and you aren't smart, talented, good looking or even a good troll for while we're on the topic of "cans and can'ts". But hey, your penis is one inch long that should at least make you kinda happy......well maybe not happy but it should get a laugh out of you.....mmmmm maybe not, well hey look at it like this Tiny Tim at least you can put a smile on the face of your "almost" sexual partners :twisted:
I'm starting to think more and more that Kuai Liang is the MKX Sub-Zero. The things he says just kinda give his identy a little more leverage. I'm not saying there is no way this Sub-Zero is Bi-Han, but I don't believe it's him anymore.
[MENTION=5028]Commander[/MENTION] - the white eyes must simply be Sub-Zero's new signature look. It wouldn't be the first time in the franchise that Subz has had pupil-less eyes.
Actually, it would.
Even in the 3D era Sub-Zero had pupils.
Light blue pupils, but he still had pupils.
View attachment 7728
And he did have normal eyes in the first comic. It's probably the scar that made his eyes white.If that was Kuai-Liang with white eyes which it wasn't, then Kuai would still be under Quan Chi's control.
Otherwise, if that Sub-Zero was Kuai-Liang brought back as himself, he'd have regular looking eyes Kitana and Kung Lao.
You're right, looks like he did. I'm still feeling Kuai, though. This guy looks like comic Subz, and comic Subz goes around doing favors for "Lord Raiden" and now he's being a mentor to kids. Bi Han could go good, but this sounds too good.
I think that you're going to far into the eyes, it's probably just for decoration.
Why would the "white eyes" actually mean something? Kuai DID HAVE white eyes in Deception and Armageddon - why are you ignoring them?Actually, it would.
Even in the 3D era Sub-Zero had pupils.
Light blue pupils, but he still had pupils.
View attachment 7728
Why would the "white eyes" actually mean something? Kuai DID HAVE white eyes in Deception and Armageddon - why are you ignoring them?
So basically, you have a primary costume without a scar and the alternate with a scar (an updated outfit of Kuai's DA costume) and you're really suggesting this is all Bi-Han?
To me it's obvious BOTH brothers are playable, but we shall see.
Yes I love to debate because it's really fun. Because the old timeline scar IS evidence in favor of Kuai Liang. The truth is that you just really do not want Kuai Liang to return as Sub-Zero, You don't even want him as a alt. costume for Bi-Han you hate him THAT much.This is coming from you who always loves to debate, trying to use the old timeline eye scar as "evidence" in favor of Kuai?
Ok. :roll:
Kuai was pretty deep into cryomancy at the time though. He didn't get those eyes until he got that ancient armor that his ancestors wore.
You don't even want him as a alt. costume for Bi-Han you hate him THAT much.
Because the old timeline scar IS evidence in favor of Kuai Liang.
Alright, maybe the eye scar isn't evidence to Kuai Liang but let me ask you this. Do these two really look the same to you?No, it's not.
Ed Boon even said that the new timeline skewed from the old timeline and that this is an alternate timeline.
So, no MK9 timeline has nothing to do with pre-MK9, from the moment that the amulet cracked.
If that's Kuai, then why would he be the only character coming back with pupil-less / dead eyes, when Kitana and Kung Lao come back as themselves with normal eyes?
That makes NO sense, at ALL.
it could be because of the scar, decoration, or like p.W just said because he's a cryomancer.If that's Kuai, then why would he be the only character coming back with pupil-less / dead eyes, when Kitana and Kung Lao come back as themselves with normal eyes?
That makes NO sense, at ALL.