Re: [SPOILER, RUMOR] Sub-Zero's identity in MKX is...
Who said that the Sub-Zero we saw getting scarred is the same Sub-Zero as the one we've seen ingame and that made a cameo later in the comic?
I want to point out, both of them show up in the comic, with wildly different outfits.
Most likely Bi-Han (middle of second row):
In this exact same vision Raiden sees Reptile standing next to Kotal Kahn. Yet, he is not in his MKX costume. So, is that a different Reptile? Oh, and cassie is in street clothes in her fight against frost. So, is there a different Cassie Cage?
Viking_Poodle just flatout said that the scar could fade, yet this is in favor of it fading on Bi-han correct? Okay, gotcha.
So, defining evidence which points to Bi-han:
1. Sinister or Dark Attitude.
2. Rivalry with Scorpion
Defining evidence which would point to Kuai Liang if we didn't give everything to Bi-han.
1. Kitana and Kung Lao have both been raised from the dead.
2. MK3 costume in the comic which is roughly 10 YEARS before Raiden's vision.
3. Kittelsen hinted that Sub-Zero would receive the Lin Kuei gear later in the comic (which we see Sub-Zero wearing in Raiden's vision)
4. Receives a scar in the comic
5. Although he has a "dark attitude" his lines in game come across as a good guy. Just listen to some of them.
6. Grandmaster variation which was previously Kuai Liang's storyline.
That is me not looking through rose tinted glasses. Honestly I want someone to point out other evidence which is really defining of Bi-han.
The whole corrupt thing I ADMIT could be Bi-han, but I do not rule it out as Kuai either because he was a SLAVE to quan chi. He was also a slave to his cyber armor which he could now be FREED of. Kuai also had the direct line of "My soul was corrupted, now it is cleansed" in MK9. Yeah, it was cleansed, but then he died and went to hell. So much for being cleansed.
All I'm saying is that there still is no way you can say Bi-Han CONFIRMED.