poopingtoad
New member
top 5 fighters(IMO)
1:kung lao 10
2:kano 9.5
3:cyrax 9.5
4:johnny cage 9
5:sub-zero 9
1:kung lao 10
2:kano 9.5
3:cyrax 9.5
4:johnny cage 9
5:sub-zero 9
If you guys could please stick with Thirteen's format, that would be great =)
Rate Scorpion and Scorpion only. That is how he wants it done so he can add up the points.
~Thanks guys =)
What are Sonya's worst matchups?Ok so if I understand correctly, we're scoring characters from 1 to 10 on "how useful/effective said character is" (quoted first post). So that means 5 is not literally the mathematical average. Considering that, I don't think I can give any character less than 5 (since no character is bad or useless in this game). Otherwise, I would have to give Sheeva and Sektor a score of 1 and 2. But like I said MK9 is pretty balanced so there are no C and D tier in this game... anyway that's going to be my reasoning for this.
Sonya: 7
She was an 8.5 pre-patch. But now she lost her block infinites.
I haven't see any good Sonyas so far but I know she has all the tools to be high-mid tier. She got good counters to zoning and her Military stance cancels still allows some nice frame traps and mixups. Sonya is high-mid tier at best though. She seems to have quite a few bad matchups.
Errr... I'm not an encyclopedia about MK9 lmao.What are Sonya's worst matchups?
Errr... I'm not an encyclopedia about MK9 lmao.
I remember Tom mentioning that Sonya has a hard time closing distance vs Sub. But that was before the very first patch. Like he says, every time a new patch comes out, everything changes. What was a good/bad matchup on patch 1.0 may no longer be the case now. So it's kinda weird to discuss matchups when all characters are still changing.
In a few weeks when we have a final (or stable) version of the game we'll be able to really analyze matchups.
I still think it's entertaining to see what people think about certain characters, but once something is put down on paper for some reason people tend to think it's true. I mean we're talking about a video game and not a drug trial or something so who really cares?...but whatever, I'm here, I'm reading this, and I obviously have nothing better to do with my time right now, so I might as well say what's on my mind.
As was just demonstrated a few posts ago, everyone has their own definition of what a 5 is for example - does it mean average, or does it mean bottom of the barrel since no one is worse than a 5? That confusion alone is enough to make the numbers invalid. Not only that, but people who admit to not knowing a character very well are still voting - and their vote will count just as much as someone who is experienced with that character. Not to mention that you'd have to be really good with every character in order to come up with any numbers at all because all characters are essentially being ranked relative to the abilities of each other. And even if you were skilled with every character, your particular playing style would still skew you to favor/dislike certain characters over others for reasons other than true character strength.
I think the only way to even get remotely close to a true tier list would involve the use of computer algorithms averaged in with actual results of experts vs experts. But in the end it's the matchups that really matter anyway.
No doubt that some people are going to look at the final tier list and feel bad about where their character is ranked or avoid playing certain characters altogether.
This tier list is going to be built around the strategic opinions of the community. I'm not trying to make it the most technologically concise list ever made. I'm making this BY TRMK FOR TRMK. I'm sorry if you find it flawed but you don't have to participate if you find it invalid.
@thirteenthorder
So aren't you going to give your own ratings on the characters?
I'm just talking. not at all trying to be offensive.