Mortal Fantasy Football Kombat 2013

Nah, that's me; I left 81 points on my bench :(

I gotta change up some stuff on my team.

Edit: Whoops, was thinking of hunger foul; I miss those.
 
Last edited:
Oh yeah, I forgot how that thing worked, lol, I kept thinking it was for one player for some reason, I forgot it was for the entire bench.


Well, that makes me feel a bit better, lol. Do they even have that hunger foul still? I forgot to check last week.
 
... address your RB position in round ONE of the draft! If you ignore that position early, you get stuck with scrubs at the most important fantasy position, and therefore screw yourself over long-term!

Like I did, after missing the entire draft! And, getting wHOoped first game. But, I scraped something together, and put that second game in the bag already! (........booooom goes the victory dynamite........)
 
No one got a hunger foul last game, so I guess it isn't in anymore. When I got the Snickers one for Peyton, it said for starting him, so it's probably just for the starter w/ the most points, which so far is Aaron Rodgers, which means atm you're still getting it anyway lol.
 
mkray said:
Also, even though I didn't say it was a terrible decision, I still gotta say that Yung taking Vick overall #2 (at least for the moment) isn't as much of a reach as I thought haha.

Lol what?
33 points.

What were you expecting 50 points per week :rolleyes:
 
Lol what?
33 points.

What were you expecting 50 points per week :rolleyes:

I know he was going to be good fantasy-wise; I just don't expect it for too long lol. Tbh, I'm just waiting for another injury so people can add to this:

Spoiler:
Michael-Vick-Injury-Bingo.jpg


:rolleyes:
 
Yup, just eight, and he lost a fumble :/

Every time he has a bad game in fantasy land, I'm just gonna blame Ponder lol.
 
I have Kaeper on my other team, lol, Romo sitting on the bench with 20 points and Kaeper has 7 in the 3rd quarter.

I am ashamed.

I am hoping, though, he gets a better break soon....he's up against the Seahawks, can't blame him for not getting points like last week.
 
mkray41 said:
Also, even though I didn't say it was a terrible decision, I still gotta say that Yung taking Vick overall #2 (at least for the moment) isn't as much of a reach as I thought haha.

No matter how good Vick is, it's still a reach, because he could have got him later, and had he done so he would have a better team. How good a player does only affects next year's draft position. It doesn't justify where you took him this year.

And before Jade yells at me again for taking this too seriously, please note I'm just offering suggestions to help you guys get better. It's much the same as if I was giving you guys strategies for MK9 or something. It shouldn't be taken personally.

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2
 
No matter how good Vick is, it's still a reach, because he could have got him later, and had he done so he would have a better team. How good a player does only affects next year's draft position. It doesn't justify where you took him this year.

And before Jade yells at me again for taking this too seriously, please note I'm just offering suggestions to help you guys get better. It's much the same as if I was giving you guys strategies for MK9 or something. It shouldn't be taken personally.

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

To add to that, fantasy football is a running back driven game, something I learned the hard way last year.

Also, I came very close to asking for a points audit involving the defenses of Jade and myself wondering how we both got an additional point before I realized that blocked kicks were worth 1 point. Apparently that particular stat doesn't show up on the basic box score.
 
Last edited:
Well damn LC just told me my picks were shit :|.

That wasn't hardly your worst pick either. I don't understand why you guys are getting so insulted by my trying to teach you guys stuff about how to get better at this though. I don't get insulted at you guys telling me how to get better at games

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2
 
What LC is trying to say is...you could've addressed more important positions such as RB in the early rounds and Ron Mexico still would've been available to you in round 5. By taking Vick first you hurt your team longterm, especially since Vick has only played and/or started all 16 games ONCE in his career, and especially since you waited until round 3 to take a RB (and I can tell you from personal experience that that is fantasy football suicide; I did the exact same shit last year, and LC can tell you the end result if you're interested), and your next RB didn't come until round 7 (who, by the way, suffered a concussion yesterday, and with the NFL's concussion guidelines taken into account, there's no telling how many games he'll miss), and you only have one other RB on your roster. If that's not bad enough, you used BOTH of your top 2 picks on QB (the real NFL may be quarterback-driven, but fantasy football is not). I hate to tell you this, but you're about to start 0-2. I suggest taking a look at the waiver wire...you should be high enough on the waiver order to get who you want.

Also, here's an interesting article that should explain why you should wait a few rounds before you take a quarterback.
 
Last edited:
Sooo inshort you just want us to get the best of the best then?

My assumption is that, as this is in fact a GAME, is that you guys are actually trying to WIN. My advice is geared toward that. If my assumption is incorrect let me know.

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2
 
Top