Cryo
New member
Who do you vote for as the better fighter?
I think I stated Johnny was my choice.
He can throw green boogers from distance where Jax ground pounds and bionic arms are rendered useless.
Who do you vote for as the better fighter?
So who does your vote go to?
Ok, I'll give my opinion. Johnny Cage has more skill than Jax, and now that Johnny takes things more serious, he is a far better fighter than he was MK9. This showed in the MKX as he defeated Scorpion, Sub Zero, and later in the chapter he defeats Smoke, Jax, and Shinnok. So Johnny is the better fighter and the better character.
Why shouldn't they be taken into account? Everything that happens in story mode is canon.
[MENTION=18661]p.W[/MENTION]
Traditionally, everything that happens in the story is canon. Granted, the writers can choose to ignore or "forget" certain specifics but that's up for them to decide; not us. I don't understand how your psychopath point correlates with what I said so I'm going to assume it didn't pertain to me.
At the end of the day, Jax and Johnny fought: Jax came out victorous. That's a fact. Everything else is left up to interpretation.
[MENTION=18661]p.W[/MENTION]
Traditionally, everything that happens in the story is canon. Granted, the writers can choose to ignore or "forget" certain specifics but that's up for them to decide; not us. I don't understand how your psychopath point correlates with what I said so I'm going to assume it didn't pertain to me.
At the end of the day, Jax and Johnny fought: Jax came out victorous. That's a fact. Everything else is left up to interpretation.
It pertains because the only way for MK heroes to not be complete morons and/or psychopaths is for many of the fights (Johnny vs Sonya, Sonya vs Raiden, Liu Kang vs Kitana, Jax vs Johnny, Smoke vs Jade) to have happened very differently from how we saw them.
So if we know that plenty of stuff in MK9 must have happened differently from how we saw it, it falls to us to figure out which stuff seems like it's bullshit and which stuff seems like it's legit and meaningful and we should account for it next time we theorize/debate/whatever. It's on us to be the detectives.
Why does this matter? Because...
I agree that in some way, shape, or form, Jax beat Johnny. However, I couldn't disagree more with using that as an argument for Jax being a better fighter than Johnny. Even if we were to take the fight seriously and interpret Johnny and Jax as being 100% motivated to win and both being in peak condition leading up to the fight, Jax could simply have gotten lucky. A sample size of 1 is worthless, so clinging to that fight as some kind of absolute proof is mega sketchy to me. I would never accept a "Stryker is a better fighter than Kintaro" argument just because Stryker once beat Kintaro and Kintaro never beat anyone, and the same goes for Jax vs Johnny.
That's why I vastly prefer [MENTION=5232]Ricochetmatt[/MENTION] 's approach of actually trying to evaluate them as fighters and seeing what strengths/weaknesses they have.
Johnny would beat Jax any day.
You are obviously biased and hate Cage so why don't you leave this thread.