2012 Strange Noises heard WORLDWIDE.

That was probably one of the biggest reasons the debate room was going to get canned.

Douchebags feel the need to mock people with different beliefs.
 
If people are being mocked then someone needs to do some growing up. lol... But if it gets any worse use the report button guys don't wanna get banned.
 
back said:
That was probably one of the biggest reasons the debate room was going to get canned.

Douchebags feel the need to mock people with different beliefs.
Click to expand...

This isn't the debate section, this is the general section.

I admit, if somehow the noises in those videos are not fake (highly unlikely) then I would genuinely be intrigued in what the source was. But how the Hell and why the Hell should anyone of sane mind, believe and respect people that have belief in a weather machine? Because we should respect their feelings? When the Hell did people become soft, that even ignorance should be tolerated.

Okay. A water molecule, also known as H20, is a molecule that contains one hydrogen atom and 2 oxygen atoms. If I made a thread and said "actually, a water molecule is made up of 3 parts orange juice, 2 parts urine, 10 parts nuclear fision" I would be ridiculed and rightly so. Or should people respect my ridiculous belief, because, we simply aren't allowed to call people out on BS anymore.
 
Flagg said:
This isn't the debate section, this is the general section.

I admit, if somehow the noises in those videos are not fake (highly unlikely) then I would genuinely be intrigued in what the source was. But how the Hell and why the Hell should anyone of sane mind, believe and respect people that have belief in a weather machine? Because we should respect their feelings? When the Hell did people become soft, that even ignorance should be tolerated.

Okay. A water molecule, also known as H20, is a molecule that contains one hydrogen atom and 2 oxygen atoms. If I made a thread and said "actually, a water molecule is made up of 3 parts orange juice, 2 parts urine, 10 parts nuclear fision" I would be ridiculed and rightly so. Or should people respect my ridiculous belief, because, we simply aren't allowed to call people out on BS anymore.
Click to expand...

That isn't the same level of ridiculousness and a unfair analogy. Of you did say such a thing I would first think you were joking, once I realized you were serious I would correct you with supporting evidence and I wouldn't need to be a dick about it.

Do you behave the same way 100% of the time when dealing with ignorance? It's a shameful display and if anything it's not them being soft as you don't see them crying and tearing in defeat. But it's you who looks weak when someone else brings evidence in and you ride the train and bash people? All you did this whole time is talk about how crazy/dumb the idea is. How about you cure ignorance and be a man about it and not follow up with some power play on words to insult others.
 
Zoidberg747 said:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Frequency_Active_Auroral_Research_Program#Objectives

Im not saying it does not exist, but look at the objectives. It is being used to improve communication systems through bad weather. It could be used to improve GPS systems, and MILITARILY could improve submarine communication and possibly even remotely locate bunkers and such in certain countries. However, IT IS NOT BEING MADE TO CONTROL THE WEATHER. That is what I was laughing at, yes it does exist, but conspiracy theorists are turning into a WAY bigger deal than it really is.

Quoted from the page:
"According to HAARP's management, the project strives for openness, and all activities are logged and publicly available. Scientists without security clearances, even foreign nationals, are routinely allowed on site. The HAARP facility regularly (once a year on most years according to the HAARP home page) hosts open houses, during which time any civilian may tour the entire facility. In addition, scientific results obtained with HAARP are routinely published in major research journals (such as Geophysical Research Letters, or Journal of Geophysical Research), written both by university scientists (American and foreign) or by U.S. Department of Defense research lab scientists. Each summer, the HAARP holds a summer school for visiting students, including foreign nationals, giving them an opportunity to do research with one of the world's foremost research instruments."
Click to expand...

Like the management of any company or project would advertise in their prospectus or otherwise any potential wrong/bad/illegal activities they may be involved especially when the Government and the military is the only interested party and stakeholder.

Flagg said:
This isn't the debate section, this is the general section.

I admit, if somehow the noises in those videos are not fake (highly unlikely) then I would genuinely be intrigued in what the source was. But how the Hell and why the Hell should anyone of sane mind, believe and respect people that have belief in a weather machine? Because we should respect their feelings? When the Hell did people become soft, that even ignorance should be tolerated.

Okay. A water molecule, also known as H20, is a molecule that contains one hydrogen atom and 2 oxygen atoms. If I made a thread and said "actually, a water molecule is made up of 3 parts orange juice, 2 parts urine, 10 parts nuclear fision" I would be ridiculed and rightly so. Or should people respect my ridiculous belief, because, we simply aren't allowed to call people out on BS anymore.
Click to expand...

So to reply to any topic outside the debate section automatically entitles you to be a douchebag? I think not.

This 'weather machine' you speak of, does exist and it is a FACT. It is a term given to the HAARP project by many conspiracy theorists since it has the potential to manipulate weather to some extent. You would have known if you had gone through the proof I posted before and not compare it to ridiculous analogies.
 
Critical-Limit said:
That isn't the same level of ridiculousness and a unfair analogy. Of you did say such a thing I would first think you were joking, once I realized you were serious I would correct you with supporting evidence and I wouldn't need to be a dick about it.

Do you behave the same way 100% of the time when dealing with ignorance? It's a shameful display and if anything it's not them being soft as you don't see them crying and tearing in defeat. But it's you who looks weak when someone else brings evidence in and you ride the train and bash people? All you did this whole time is talk about how crazy/dumb the idea is. How about you cure ignorance and be a man about it and not follow up with some power play on words to insult others.
Click to expand...

I've been writing essays and reports for the last 4 years, and all of them have to be heavily sourced with reliable sources.

How about this. I will issue a legit, debate challenge to the MK9Scorpion avatar guy, and ANYONE that genuinely believes that America has a sonic weapon either in Alaska or the North Pole. How about an essay challenge. 2000 words. I don't have access to a university library but im confident I can still find things on Google Scholar to refute this claim, with reliable sources, written by academic peers. I have studied how earthquakes occur, i have studied how things like hurricanes and tsunamis form. To suggest that we can manipulate these things, man made is preposterous, and I will gladly explain all of this in a Debate Challenge.

2000 words.

Yes or no?

FJ and Critical, you unfairly judge me and while you can say that I have done just the same, I believe you are making a point of calling me out because I exposed someone who clearly has no academic knowledge on this.

If anyone want's to take me up on this challenge, and I find proof of this machine, and I find proof that it could be used to the extremes that caused the Japan earthquake, ALSO SOMETHING I STUDIED IN THE LAST 12 MONTHS, then I will put that down, without bias, and eat my hat.

I personally dont think 2000 words is nowhere near enough to explain all of this in detail, but that's the challenge I guess of such a small essay.

I should add, the essay should be about the credibility of said machine and the supposed effects that said machine is capable of.
 
Last edited:
Flagg said:
I've been writing essays and reports for the last 4 years, and all of them have to be heavily sourced with reliable sources.

How about this. I will issue a legit, debate challenge to the MK9Scorpion avatar guy, and ANYONE that genuinely believes that America has a sonic weapon either in Alaska or the North Pole. How about an essay challenge. 2000 words. I don't have access to a university library but im confident I can still find things on Google Scholar to refute this claim, with reliable sources, written by academic peers. I have studied how earthquakes occur, i have studied how things like hurricanes and tsunamis form. To suggest that we can manipulate these things, man made is preposterous, and I will gladly explain all of this in a Debate Challenge.

2000 words.

Yes or no?

FJ and Critical, you unfairly judge me and while you can say that I have done just the same, I believe you are making a point of calling me out because I exposed someone who clearly has no academic knowledge on this.

If anyone want's to take me up on this challenge, and I find proof of this machine, and I find proof that it could be used to the extremes that caused the Japan earthquake, ALSO SOMETHING I STUDIED IN THE LAST 12 MONTHS, then I will put that down, without bias, and eat my hat.

I personally dont think 2000 words is nowhere near enough to explain all of this in detail, but that's the challenge I guess of such a small essay.

I should add, the essay should be about the credibility of said machine and the supposed effects that said machine is capable of.
Click to expand...

All I'm saying is what if I acted the way you did when someone was ignorant about gameplay? I've posted thousands of words explaining things and people still post about it despite my evidence to the contrary. You won't find a post of me mocking people and implying they are crazy or borderline dumb.

It's unnecessary behavior and I know you know this.

Come on man :/

Dont be a dingle berry and blow it up in their faces.
 
Ah cmon Critical, I posted a video about nWo from wcw and I made a comment about Ming the Merciless and you're making out I crucified the pro Haarp machine. I mean, that is exactly how Ming was conquering earth....by using his weather machine. A fictional bad guy with a hillarious beard, defeated by an American footballer.

I don't believe in a NWO, as in a clandestine group that want to rule the world with one government and the reason why, is the *******s that run the world dont want the world to change. They like it exactly the way it is, because while they are only 5% of the population on the planet, they control 90% of all global wealth.

The sad truth is, the world is depressingly boring. Mystique makes things a bit more interesting, but that's about it.
 
Zoidberg747 said:
Why are my big long ass explanation posts never appreciated-_-
Click to expand...

I appreciated and read them Zoidberg ;D


@Flagg: No i'm not acting like you crucified anybody. I'm not even blowing it up that bad. I'm just explaining why I think that post wasn't necessary.

I'm not even reacting emotionally toward you at all. I just think the whole message plus the part with you mentioning "tin foil hat" ect. Was unnecessary, and wasn't even really funny(to me anyways). It looked more like a jab at someone than a "joke"
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top