[MENTION=5028]Commander[/MENTION] you alleged NRS changed course after E3. We are showing the timeline makes that impossible.
Kung Lao's old man design is a what if, but that doesn't mean his playable status was. Why would they commission concept art for a model they didn't plan to use??? That stuff isn't free.
Your Rain example would hold water (ha ha) if he were playable. He's not. How then does the fan demand impact who's an NPC and who's on the roster? Tremor is an example of fan demand, yes. So is Tanya. And they're DLC, which is exactly the smart thing to do with characters you're adding due to fan demand.
It's not as if these characters simply died in MK9. We saw them brought back as revenants. It's entirely logical to have them back -- the three heroes whose deaths Raiden regrets most. I continue to fail to see any compelling evidence for your theory. I'm not trying to be rude, it just doesn't hold up.
And I'm saying that the timeline for fan requests doesn't necessarily have to be during the time of MKX's production.
It could, but it doesn't have to.
It could have been from earlier that fans were requesting it.
How do you know that those 3 characters weren't requested a couple of years after MK9, during Injustice, for the next MK game?
Tremor was a HIGHLY requested character during the time of MK9 too, and they just NOW put him in.
How do you know that NRS didn't plan to have those 3 as unplayable and only in the story, originally, and afterwards decided to cave into the fan demand?
You don't.
You have no more proof towards the contrary than I do.
Concept art is done ALL the time for MK games, but it doesn't mean that that concept art always makes it in.
There was a TON of concept art in Deadly Alliance and Deception that was in the Krypt that never made it to the final game.
Tremor is a perfect example of people requesting a character for 2 games and he finally gets put in, though.
That's my point.
The timeline for fan requests doesn't necessarily have to start when the game is announced and can be before that.
I'll give you a perfect example.
As soon as I finished playing through Dishonored (2012), I Tweeted the creators of the game with some cool stuff that I thought would be neat in a possible future sequel.
Now, if others also let them know of the same thing that I suggested for a future sequel and it's finally put in due to fan demand but wasn't part of their original plans for the sequel, then that could be seen as requests that were made prior to the start of the sequel.
That's what I'm getting at.
Sure, but then how does that explain the logic for Smoke, Kabal, Sindel and Nightwolf coming back.
If it's good for the goose, it's good for the gander.
I'm not trying to be rude, either.
I just don't see the logic in Kitana, Liu Kang and Kung Lao being revenants but are playable, yet the others who are also revenants are not playable, if not for fan demand.
Fan demand is the sole logical explanation for why Liu, Kitana and Kung Lao are playable, and the other revenants aren't.