Evidence that Rain could be playable [Spoilers]

...then the title should be "Rain is Playable," eh? Not "could be." He already is.

It should actually have been "NPCs Playable on PC after Modding," but that wouldn't have gotten nearly so many thread clicks, now, would it? ;)

Are you really going to be petty and pick on how the thread title is worded? Everything is explained in the top post.
 
Are you really going to be petty and pick on how the thread title is worded? Everything is explained in the top post.

You're the one who started this discussion of semantics, not me.

All I said to the OP was "people are holding you accountable for your words." You want to single me out for the negative responses the OP has received in this thread... because I explained why he's receiving them?
 
You're the one who started this discussion of semantics, not me.

All I said to the OP was "people are holding you accountable for your words." You want to single me out for the negative responses the OP has received in this thread... because I explained why he's receiving them?

That depends, are you one of the people who's holding him accountable for how he worded the thread title?
 
People are holding you responsible for your words, nothing more and nothing less. Your thread title promises evidence. This is not that.

That doesn't give people right to be harsh though, yes ive mistakenly written the topic title wrong, i should of put 'Possibility' instead of 'Evidence' and also..

"Whilst it's not actual factual evidence the video shows how well the character can be used and it's obvious no-brainer to add them."

You can have informing evidence or factual evidence, ive already stated it's not factual evidence..
 
That depends, are you one of the people who's holding him accountable for how he worded the thread title?

I surely am, but I so hate to monopolize your ire.

You think the misspeak in the title is accidental and maybe it was. Or maybe it's click-bait designed to get lots of people to read the OP on false pretense. It wouldn't be the first time and it wouldn't be the last.
 
[MENTION=19623]Joeyj36[/MENTION], no, there is no way to unlock him unless he is modded on the PC. Who would want to play as that lazy excuse of a boss anyway?
 
There must be a way in order to use him he has to be on the disc a mod can't create that it can only do what's on the disc so I beleive he's playable on the consoles
 
Punctuation is your friend.

This is kind of embarrassing for NRS. Even more so because they are trying to sell one of these characters as DLC. I know, we know that dlc Tanya will be much different from this modded version, but does the average IGN reader know that? And now there are all of these videos of pc players using a DLC characters and 3 others being used. I feel like NRS is gonna have to answer to it in some reason, because it has an impact on public expectation.
 
Punctuation is your friend.

This is kind of embarrassing for NRS. Even more so because they are trying to sell one of these characters as DLC. I know, we know that dlc Tanya will be much different from this modded version, but does the average IGN reader know that? And now there are all of these videos of pc players using a DLC characters and 3 others being used. I feel like NRS is gonna have to answer to it in some reason, because it has an impact on public expectation.

I think we'll hear a response from NRS on this sooner or later. By the way, is your avatar icon from Yojimbo? I love Akira Kurosawa's work. Seven Samurai, Yojimbo and all that.
 
Well, in his defense, Ed Boon did tease at a "Story Pack" with NPCs from story being playable. But who knows. Could be another one of his trolling antics.
 
It's not meaningless, because due to mods, Rain is actually playable. He's broken and unfinished, but he's playable.
Well if you call a broken as character playable that was in MK9, and now DUE TO MODS hes (playable in your words) wouldnt call it playable at all would call it broken as shizz. Touché
 
Top