Official Street Fighter Thread

From what I understand, Urien won't have his classic costume as a choosable costume, but is one that appears after he's done his Critical Art.

I performed his CA and nothing happened. Either there is another condition required, or it's a feature not available in Story Mode.

I think it should have been a Story Mode alt, considering the one he has currently is kind of redundant.
 
I performed his CA and nothing happened. Either there is another condition required, or it's a feature not available in Story Mode.

I think it should have been a Story Mode alt, considering the one he has currently is kind of redundant.

It's not in Story Mode, but data-miners seems to have found out about it. He wears the loincloth and is otherwise nude under his regular clothes, like being barefoot inside his shoes, which hints heavily to him being able to shed his costume in-game by doing his Critical Art.
 
Not sure if it's real or not but..
51619518a4def5b45df79edae641d077.jpg


Sent from my SGH-I337M using Tapatalk
 
There's so much salt on the reddit atm.
The CPT has people hate Capcom for the microtransactions.
People are still hating the way you obtain colours in the game.
And there is an exploit that makes you gain infinite Fight Money, and because of this, there's rumours that Capcom might remove the whole Fight Money feature and put EVERYTHING on as microtransactions.

There might be some rather unpleasant changes coming in the future. :/
 
If the rumors are true, then Capcom evidently hasn't learned jack shit from the SFxT debacle that sank their rating with the Better Business Bureau.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I547 using Tapatalk
 
There's so much salt on the reddit atm.
The CPT has people hate Capcom for the microtransactions.
People are still hating the way you obtain colours in the game.
And there is an exploit that makes you gain infinite Fight Money, and because of this, there's rumours that Capcom might remove the whole Fight Money feature and put EVERYTHING on as microtransactions.

There might be some rather unpleasant changes coming in the future. :/

So instead of fixing the exploit, just remove entire feature and piss off a lot of people, because they bought a game which was marketed with "fight money" feature? Nah. Even CAPCOM can't get THIS low.
 
It should be noted that Sony got Class Action Sued over the removal of the "Other OS" feature on the PS3. History can repeat itself.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I547 using Tapatalk
 
I seriously don't blame anyone for using the exploit. But it kinda hurts other people if this falls through.

It's Capcom's fault for failing to fix this. This would be like what Ubisoft did with the Division where they banned players for exploiting a raid glitch. Sometimes these companies need to just take it on the chin and fix the problems they created.
 
If it's programmed into the game on its own, it should be legal. Ubisoft's "solution" to the Division glitch was a dick move.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I547 using Tapatalk
 
So, what you're saying is that all glitches and bugs should just stay in a game?
That's not what I'm saying. What I'm saying is if the publisher or dev wish to keep it in the game, they should NOT ban people for using it. If it's in the game, it's legal. If it's third party modification (such as GameShark), it's cheating.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I547 using Tapatalk
 
Top