Welp, I guess I'm not allowed to voice my opinion then, huh?

You know that's not what i'm implying. Hell, you're usually someone I look forward to reading their thoughts, even if it doesn't go along with mine.
My point is, I see on every single forum, on youtube, on facebook...the same complaints. It just gets tiresome. "Flash could never beat Shazam", "Joker beat Lex? BS this is just a popularity contest(yeah, that's the point...not sure why people thought otherwise)", and "Batman beat Wonder Woman?! No way, that's bullshit, she got robbed". As well as the Batman complaints in general, and the whole "Batman vs. Superman in the finals, so lame, stupid popularity cotnest". Well...even if it was based on who would actually win, the outcome wouldn't be much different. Superman would still go to the finals. And the other would either be Wonder Woman or Flash. Wonder Woman's gameplay has been pretty damn boring, so that wouldn't be the most exciting thing itself... And if you for some reason wanted other people to win, taking the popularity and logistics of who would actually win out of it, even if we get ____ vs. ____ in the finals, does it really matter?
That's all I was trying to say.
Anyways, my personal thoughts:
I love that they played up Batman's resourcefulness in this fight. For all the people that need things to make sense, i'm surprised this wasn't something people pointed out that they enjoyed. Whereas Wonder Woman just used her brute force, Batman was the one to use all the stage interactions and transitions to aid him in defeating her.
They all seemed to be a bit more logical in how the fights played out this time around. Batman was resourceful and tactical. The Flash was just too quick for the Joker to react in most cases. Green Lantern and Aquaman was a much closer fight than the other 3. Superman vs Green Arrow was mostly one sided and quick.
Was great seeing the alternate attires as well.