Sn202
New member
Champions = best.
Substance is ALWAYS better than style.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I547 using Tapatalk
Not when the character is shit.
Champions = best.
Substance is ALWAYS better than style.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I547 using Tapatalk
What are you getting at? How is mk1 to mk3 better then now? And how is the formula less then ten percent? Compared to the old games. I really don't get it.About technology and limitations were very bad managed by boon. more above i was explained this.
Are you ask me suck boon ´s balls? sorry bro but not, thank you, i want to be always make an analysis and then play, watching detail by detail,
be a gamer player is not all in life imo.
You ask me for live in the present day, but Present day there is not life on mk, cause mk is less than a shadow, nobody here stops to thinks those details, and i am not saying that i am smart than anybody.
Suddenly i´m not saying that if Tobias keept at present the exact classic games. But yes keep this original formula at least at 75%. With boon the forumla is less at 10%, even ppl like arkanoyd commander thinks that i have a closed mind, lol.
The stupid story of deadly alliance from boon´s whim is the same like happened between mkar and mk9, they has decided throw all to the trash, cause never and never midway team did not get ideas for continue on kang. Why subzero design at mkd sucks alot in comparision with mkda design? cause is more "simple", is the only few things made by boon in combination with tobias at 1995. Difference is that in 1992/1993 tobias had more influence than boon. And voguel, again is the most stupid member ever on mk team imo him has washed the brain to several users.
back to kang who know what tobias has planned for kang at the 5th of mk? say again,cause in mk4, tobias wanted re-fix the errors from boon at mk3....... I would not be so sure, if kang was based in bruce is not enought excuse for not evolve to him,.
Would you rather be exciting or would you rather win championships?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I547 using Tapatalk
How can he who wins championships be "shit"? It's impossible.Not when the character is shit.
I personality would like the exciting character who tried and went out with a bang. Like how Kung Lao died. I could hear the screaming Kung Lao fans in the distance. Lol well it wasn't much of a bang but it was shocking.
How can he who wins championships be "shit"? It's impossible.
By your logic, Tony Romo is better than Tim Duncan...I mean, Romo is an exciting talent who loses with a BANG, while Duncan is such a boring player, but wins championships.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I547 using Tapatalk
just because he wins championships doesnt mean he's a good character.
It means he's the BEST character.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I547 using Tapatalk
Name 500 things that are more important than winning.No.
Stop.
He's a shit character who exists soley to solve the problem. He's not interesting. Nobody cares if he wins championships. Nobody but you.
Name 500 things that are more important than winning.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I547 using Tapatalk
So interesting people is more important than winning?Do you have semblance of what a cohesive narrative is.
Or what interests people.
At all.
Liu Kang isnt real, his accomplishments dont mean anything if he doesnt interest the player.
So interesting people is more important than winning?
HELL NO! Winning is to be held above all else, both in fiction and in reality! Win at all costs!
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I547 using Tapatalk
Are you dull in the head?
Like, you've got to be messing with me right now, because nobody is this dumb.
[MENTION=7297]Sn202[/MENTION] values flash over winningIts best not to waste your time, bro.
[MENTION=7297]Sn202[/MENTION] values flash over winning
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I547 using Tapatalk
So you value style over substance?I value good storytelling and proper narrative, if thats what you're saying.
If it is what you're saying, than yeah, i do, thanks for recognizing that.
So you value style over substance?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I547 using Tapatalk
Which is exclusively defined by winning!No, i value quality.
Which is exclusively defined by winning!
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I547 using Tapatalk
Ah HAH! I got you! Once you start telling people to "shut the hell up", you know you can't win an argument.Please shut the hell up.
Ah HAH! I got you! Once you start telling people to "shut the hell up", you know you can't win an argument.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I547 using Tapatalk