MoonEye821
New member
I am sorry, but has any one else waundered why all of the sudden MK with MKD is winning awards left and right? I don't rememer this many awards, or any for that matter, for any other MK.
I mean, look at it, it's basicaly JUST MKDA with added more fatalities, new hara kilis, and stage fatalities. I know that sounds like a lot. But I would say a good 95% of the games core is an exact replica of MKDA. Difrent Characters with Diffrent Backgrounds. THe only true thing new that is significant is the Stage Fatalities. Besides that it's just the same formula, with dofrent characts and backgrounds. The game-play is identical. The graphics are nowhere near as decrative. MKDA was in for more fancy areas, and thus where far more lexuriace backgrounds. It's like MK1 to MK2. Both Arcades ran on basicaly the same machine. The graphics for the characters where greatly improoved. But look at the backgrounds. In MK1 you get a palace, a bride, and Statues, Guards, just far more fancy. In MK2 you got a pit, death, and green Acid.
So, the backgrounds where more pleasing to the eye in MK1 and MKDA. And look at the characters! They're fighting styles are TOTAL rips from MKDA! Sub-Zero's only true difrence is the sub-tracted point that he can no longer stab his weapon into his oponot. Besides that subtraction, which makes him far less desirable, and the ice clone rather than the shaking thing, which served the same effect of having a freeze someone has to jump into, everything else game-play wise is the SAME.
Havok is a rip of Tsung and Chi's first fighting styles!
I just find it interesting that is you add Stage Fatalities, darker atmosphere, and more fatalities. You can get awards left and right. But having one heck of a game two years earlier only gets, at MOST, a few casual wispers of aplause.
MKD is just MKDA with stage fatalities, and a guest star aperance from Capcoms Ken under a code name!
And look at MK 1, 2, 3, U2, T, SF, SZM, 4, and G! None of them got awards from my knowledge until years after their release. Or at least not as many. All they get from the general public was scorn for blood content. And years later praised slightly for being the first bloody fighter. That's all the general public cared about the first game or two. Then they forget everything until MKD.
I just find it interesting that no one gives hardly any posotive public recognition of the MK series until MKD. Then they hold MKD as revolutionizing 3D fighting. While in truth about a good 95% of MKD's revolutions where what it copied from MKDA; which was release two years prior and got hardly nothing!
I mean, look at it, it's basicaly JUST MKDA with added more fatalities, new hara kilis, and stage fatalities. I know that sounds like a lot. But I would say a good 95% of the games core is an exact replica of MKDA. Difrent Characters with Diffrent Backgrounds. THe only true thing new that is significant is the Stage Fatalities. Besides that it's just the same formula, with dofrent characts and backgrounds. The game-play is identical. The graphics are nowhere near as decrative. MKDA was in for more fancy areas, and thus where far more lexuriace backgrounds. It's like MK1 to MK2. Both Arcades ran on basicaly the same machine. The graphics for the characters where greatly improoved. But look at the backgrounds. In MK1 you get a palace, a bride, and Statues, Guards, just far more fancy. In MK2 you got a pit, death, and green Acid.
So, the backgrounds where more pleasing to the eye in MK1 and MKDA. And look at the characters! They're fighting styles are TOTAL rips from MKDA! Sub-Zero's only true difrence is the sub-tracted point that he can no longer stab his weapon into his oponot. Besides that subtraction, which makes him far less desirable, and the ice clone rather than the shaking thing, which served the same effect of having a freeze someone has to jump into, everything else game-play wise is the SAME.
Havok is a rip of Tsung and Chi's first fighting styles!
I just find it interesting that is you add Stage Fatalities, darker atmosphere, and more fatalities. You can get awards left and right. But having one heck of a game two years earlier only gets, at MOST, a few casual wispers of aplause.
MKD is just MKDA with stage fatalities, and a guest star aperance from Capcoms Ken under a code name!
And look at MK 1, 2, 3, U2, T, SF, SZM, 4, and G! None of them got awards from my knowledge until years after their release. Or at least not as many. All they get from the general public was scorn for blood content. And years later praised slightly for being the first bloody fighter. That's all the general public cared about the first game or two. Then they forget everything until MKD.
I just find it interesting that no one gives hardly any posotive public recognition of the MK series until MKD. Then they hold MKD as revolutionizing 3D fighting. While in truth about a good 95% of MKD's revolutions where what it copied from MKDA; which was release two years prior and got hardly nothing!