Basically this.The art and atmosphere of MKII is a lot better, the fatalities are generally better and music is easily my favorite in the series.
BUT... UMK3's mechanics, juggles and varied characters are a lot better than anything in MKII. I've played more of it than almost any game ever, and anyone who spends any real time (like literally months of their life directly spent playing) can see that the gameplay in UMK3 is better. The gameplay is so good that, up until MK9, it was essentially the only MK that high level players played.
I'm not mad at you and didn't mean to attack you. I just don't think saying "MKII is only for shitty fans" was necessary. But thank you, I will refute that.If you find my opinion wrong, by all means refute it. But if I am correct why take it out on me?
Actually no. Beating the AI is not as impressive as beating good human opponents. Is it more impressive to beat the MKII AI than the AI in more recent MK's? Sure. But it's nothing like beating a quality human opponent. I can beat the MKII AI too. That doesn't make me any good either.I'm not mad at you and didn't mean to attack you. I just don't think saying "MKII is only for shitty fans" was necessary. But thank you, I will refute that.
I'm not the best MK player in the world. I already know that. But I'm not the worst either. Actually, I recently achieved a 10-match winning streak against the MKII AI using Sub-Zero. I almost even beat the game without having to continue, losing only to Scorpion and Shao Kahn, who were easily defeated thereafter. I even got to see that secret staff portrait screen you only get to see if you DO beat the game without continuing. Impressive?