Re: [SPOILER, RUMOR] Sub-Zero's identity in MKX is...
*Was. Things could very well change this time. I don't know how you can't see that. Kuai wasn't supposed to be a robot, Johnny was supposed to be dead, Kung Lao was not supposed to be dead, etc. I don't see what is so absurd about Bi Han inheriting the eye scar.
Exactly.
Also in regards to the Sub-Zero in the comic. Bi-Han served Quan Chi as Noob Saibot and got kicked into the soulnado. How in the hell would Quan Chi come back into possession of him as Sub-Zero and why would Bi-Han let Quan Chi control him now that he's free?
The red dragon grunt in the story made it clear that this SUB-ZERO served Quan Chi. The only Sub-Zero who was definitively serving Quan Chi at the end of MK9 was Kuai Liang. Bi-Han ONLY served him as Noob Saibot.
Also don't bring mythologies up as a counterargument because this story is trying to reach to CASUAL fans as well. Many of whom don't even know what mythologies is.
Why would Quan Chi possess Bi-Han in MKX, anyways?
MKX comics Scorpion is living proof that when he's away from Quan Chi, he gains his humanity and he can control the wraith.
Bi-Han could have survived the Soulnado and have done the same thing, and controlled the wraith within him.
It would actually explain very well why he tells Ermac that his soul is free and not corrupted.
Since he no longer serves Quan Chi.
Bi-Han also likely served Quan Chi as Sub-Zero during Mythologies.
Mythlogies is canon, whether you like it or not, so yes, I will bring it up.
The CASUAL fans could give less than 2 shits if Sub-Zero is Bi-Han or Kuai-Liang.
They don't follow the story like us hardcore guys do.
They just want the blue ice "ninja" which is called "Sub-Zero."
That's it.
The only ones who actually care which Sub-Zero brother it is, or if it's an entirely new one, are the hardcore fans like me and you.