C-Sword
New member
http://www.1up.com/do/blogEntry?bId=9099175
''The graphics of the Mortal Kombat Vita port bloody stink!''
''The graphics of the Mortal Kombat Vita port bloody stink!''
Everything looks so polygonal :/
It reminds me of like ps2 GTA graphics
Hopefully my friend will pick up this game for Vita since he brings his Vita to school a lot.
Then I can give a hands-on opinion.
You keep comparing the game to the PS3 version wanting that exact level of graphics, which is just not possible. NetherRealm delivered DETAILED graphics with detailed 3D backgrounds running at 60fps on a portable system, which I say is better than any other game.
You also say it's like PSP MK or PS2 MK. This is what MK looked like on the PSP:
No I'm not saying the graphics of the characters are bad.
I'm saying that the shapes look a little geometric to me.
See how Shao Kahn's torso doesn't round out well?
When the game is running at 60fps on the actual device, you don't notice the lack of polygons as easily.
Who really gives a shit what the graphics look like on the handheld
It's still ****ing Mortal Kombat on a handheld, isn't it
Who really gives a shit what the graphics look like on the handheld
It's still ****ing Mortal Kombat on a handheld, isn't it
Yeah but you have to realize that it literally has almost everything that the console version has and then some yet you can still take it anywhere you want to play with you. We're talking about just a handheld version, yet it has the whole console package. It even runs at 60 FPS. The fact that the only compromises are that the graphics are a little rough around the edges (which shouldn't seriously hinder your enjoyment of the game) and no King of the Hill (I think?) is a pretty incredible feat within itself. So, I don't know about you, but to me, that would justify the money I spend getting the console and the gameIt's a handheld system and right now, the PSP Vita doesn't have a lot going for it [in my opinion] so I give a lot of "shit."
If I'm going to pay 250 dollars for a handheld, I expect to be delivered great quality and bang-for-my-buck in its games.
It's a handheld system and right now, the PSP Vita doesn't have a lot going for it [in my opinion] so I give a lot of "shit."
If I'm going to pay 250 dollars for a handheld, I expect to be delivered great quality and bang-for-my-buck in its games. It doesn't need to be perfect. I don't have high standards.
I just want to be able to play the game and be like "Hmm this is pretty nice-looking for a handheld!"
If getting the whole console package of MK9 plus some extra content on a handheld isn't enough for you, then how exactly would just having better graphics/less polygonal-looking stuff justify getting it? That's what I'm not getting at all from you
... Wasn't saying that you said it would be bad or that you were speaking for everyone. I'm asking what would better graphics do for you than an extra Challenge Tower, new costumes, etc. doesn't do for you. I'm asking you why you feel the way you do about that
-I never liked the original challenge tower so a bigger one doesn't appeal to me
-I could care less for classic costumes but I do like that completely new ones are being added
So I need more than some costumes and augmented reality.