Bi han or kuai liang more likely to return in mk10?

Which one?

  • Bi Han

    Votes: 25 65.8%

  • Kuai Liang

    Votes: 13 34.2%
  • Total voters
    38
dude it's right there you are wrong get over it. the whole story of mk vs Dc isn't canon. You can't pick and choose what is and isn't canon. pulse dude It's a video game character. lol
 
Subz 711 said:
1. No, he was evil as hell, and I just told you that Raiden told him that in MK:mythologies. He was an evil killer. He murdered for money. Bi Han is evil. He was never neutral, he was merely trying to accomplish a task that he was hired for when he went against Quan Chi and Shinnok.
Click to expand...
Raiden didn't outright say that Sub-Zero was evil, he only confirmed what Quan Chi said to Bi Han (that the only reason he was able to exist in the NetherRealm was because of the evil in his heart)

And Bi-Han is definitely neutral. Like, not even a question. Killing for money doesn't make him evil, only corrupt just like the clan he works for. If he were "very evil" like you say he is, then he wouldn't have followed Raiden's order to steal the amulet back from Shinnok, he would have just tried to kill him and sided with Shinnok instead. Judging by that same logic, Cyrax and Kuai Liang and Smoke and Sektor were all evil, too. Pretty sure they killed people for money back then; I mean, they were assassins just like Bi Han was, right? There's also the fact that he even bothered to ask Raiden if what Quan Chi said was really true, as if he were concerned of it. Most truly evil people would be proud of the fact that they're evil and that people notice it. He also spared Sareena, so he must have had some kind of conscience left despite his ruthlessness to actually spare someone, right?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top