Re: MK VS SF: Ideas
Instead of everybody from both sides, Why not add just the bad guys from SF? People like Bison, Sagat, Gill etc
The premisse is good, however...there is no SF without Ryu. And as of Alpha, Sagat reformed.
Nah, because I really want to be able to boot Dan's head off.
You see, this is the exact reason this idea was shot down on Unity. Every time a SF fan lurks through a MK Forum, or a Forum that has a Thread with this title, they see the number one reason of MK fans for wanting such Crossover being "to chop a SF character's head off", never for "fun times" sake. Come on...!
I just don't see Capcom letting their characters even the villains, do hyper violent things.
Sadly,
Ono said something on those lines recently.
Has there been an evil ken in an official street fighter game? If so tell me. Also nice signature
Evil Ken has only appeared on a Crossover game. That's not to say he can't appear again, as the idea was taken from the Animated Movie.
BUT, blood and guts aren't all MK is anymore and since it finally has a competitive fighting engine behind it, being T-Rated shouldn't be a dealbreaker if this ever did happen.
Now you are being reasonable.
As to try to make people from Unity like the idea, I pitted it in these lines, see if it can work:
"Imagine it being made by Capcom (...)
The game would have sparks instead of blood. It could have a Chi Bar, like
Tao Feng. Once the bar is filled, the character could do something unique (An Hyper? Healing? The
V-Ism Trail?) to him."
When a character is defeated, his opponent can perform something on him (A Fatality? Mercy? Or, if the opponent is a joke character, a Friendship?). IMO, it all depends on how the move is shown...it's not like a move like
this can't kill. In a MK character's case, the move can be shown like
this."
I even added, "if blood is that big of a deal, we could have either Darkstalkers or SF2-like blood."
So, have I succeded? Is the idea likable...on TRMK?